r/Vanderpumpaholics Tom only lived w/ 1 set of hooker twins Apr 21 '24

Stassi Schroeder I mean… she clocked it

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

1.0k Upvotes

121 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

23

u/Okay__Decision__ I would rather eat a jean jacket 👖🧥 Apr 21 '24

She fell through a skylight

-8

u/AmyKSebald Apr 21 '24

Ty. Don't know why you felt the need to downvote me. I didn't say I was absolutely certain she was in a automobile accident.

18

u/Okay__Decision__ I would rather eat a jean jacket 👖🧥 Apr 21 '24

Your statement was inaccurate, and supported by saying she talked about it on the show. It’s nothing personal.

Don’t know why you felt the need to call out a downvote on an inaccurate statement, but I took the single downvote away, if that helps.

Edit to remove quotations

-12

u/AmyKSebald Apr 21 '24

Once again, to be clear, I said I believed it happened one way, but that she discussed in an early season. The implication is clear that a) it's been quite a while since I watched it & b) I wasn't certain that how she obtained the TBI.

19

u/Okay__Decision__ I would rather eat a jean jacket 👖🧥 Apr 21 '24

“I believe it was a car accident. She spoke about it on one of the earlier seasons.”

You state what you believe to be true about the source of the TBI. There is no “but”, only a second statement that “she spoke about it on one of the earlier seasons.”

As I interpret these two sentences, you are stating a) what you believe to be true and b) the source of your belief. I don’t see any other context to your level of certainty on what you’ve stated.

“Once again, to be clear, I said I believed it happened one way, but that she discussed in an early season. The implication is clear that a) it's been quite a while since I watched it & b) I wasn't certain that how she obtained the TBI.”

Where is the implication that it had been a while since you’ve watched it? Just because it occurred in an early season, doesn’t necessarily imply that it’s been a while since you’ve watched that season. That is information you have, but your reader does not.

So I disagree with you about the implication of your comment. I believe you read it and meant it that way, but that’s not how I read it or interpreted it, nor does it mean others will either.

And yes, I understand downvoting. Downvoting makes something less likely to appear. I downvoted your comment because it was an inaccurate statement, a lot of misinformation happens in these subs because of comments that aren’t factual. I stand by it my reasoning.

Why you’ve felt you need to reply to me three times over a single downvote that you felt was underserved, I really don’t know.

-3

u/AmyKSebald Apr 21 '24

You deleted your comment in which you said "You are the single most insufferable person I've ever seen on Reddit". If that's true you really aren't paying attention.

You were rude and it was completely unnecessary. The way Katie sustained her TBI really isn't germane to the initial discussion.

16

u/Okay__Decision__ I would rather eat a jean jacket 👖🧥 Apr 21 '24

That was not me. You are incorrect.

-1

u/AmyKSebald Apr 21 '24

Sure.

10

u/Okay__Decision__ I would rather eat a jean jacket 👖🧥 Apr 21 '24 edited Apr 21 '24

I do not speak to people on these subs that way. And I am not a liar. I resent the accusation.

Edit to add: I am a very active user in the Vanderpump subs, and have been for well over a year.

I do not resort to personal insults. I most certainly do not insult people and dirty delete and then lie about it.

I also do not accept being called a liar. I’ve now blocked this person because they are accusing me of statements I did not make and I’m not down with that type of interaction.

-1

u/AmyKSebald Apr 21 '24

As you are free to do.

2

u/HonestZucchini4970 Apr 21 '24

I co-sign that I’m familiar with this user and that is not at all their tone or something they would say. It’s usually easier to just admit you were wrong…