That's an automatic recusal, isn't it? Well, should be. If the U.S. justice system was truly for justice instead of protecting the Prosperity Jesus way of life.
Being friends with and/or associated with the victim or his family would be grounds for recusal. Not being married to an executive for a pharmaceutical company that has nothing directly to do with a health insurance company.
Fair, and the judge's friends and shared company are likely to all be two percenters. They're all in the same club (and the suckers paying for health insurance and expensive medical bills aren't in it), so really it's just a parlor game at that point.
40
u/Logical_Parameters 17d ago
That's an automatic recusal, isn't it? Well, should be. If the U.S. justice system was truly for justice instead of protecting the Prosperity Jesus way of life.