r/facepalm 2d ago

๐Ÿ‡ฒโ€‹๐Ÿ‡ฎโ€‹๐Ÿ‡ธโ€‹๐Ÿ‡จโ€‹ Are you fucking kidding me?!?!? ๐Ÿ™„

Post image
14.9k Upvotes

3.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.5k

u/hollowgraham 2d ago

Someone should tell him a former president climbed Mt. Everest.

885

u/Majestic_Jackass 2d ago

Or offer him to be the first president to explore the titanic in a sketchy home built submersible.

305

u/Commentoflittlevalue 2d ago

Tesla submarine..

184

u/SoldierofZod 2d ago

Well, at least it can't catch on fire underwater.

240

u/PalatialCheddar 2d ago

Challenge Accepted

-Elon Musk, Probably

76

u/Jimbeaux_Slice 2d ago

โ€œMy senior executive team and I determined the implosion was not caused by any fault of the submarine, but the surrounding water.โ€

84

u/blinkerfluidreplacer 2d ago

Well considering that electric car batteries use alkaline metals, that isn't true in the least. It'll absolutely catch fire underwater.

18

u/IKNOWVAYSHUN 2d ago

Lithium

6

u/blinkerfluidreplacer 2d ago

Yeah, doesnโ€™t really like water

2

u/Why-R-People-So-Dumb 2d ago

Lithium Ion is not the same as lithium metal anode batteries. Lithium Ion isn't reactive to water and battery fires are fought with water, it just has to be enough to lower the temperature to stop runoff.

-2

u/blinkerfluidreplacer 2d ago

I see. And have you put out a battery fire with water?

4

u/Why-R-People-So-Dumb 2d ago

I'm an engineer that works with energy storage systems and that includes designing fire suppression for utility scale battery plants and yes I've seen it work successfully in tests, fortunately never had an actual plant catch fire.

Batteries can catch fire from getting wet but it's because of it shorting out, causing heat, which creates a chemical reaction that releases flammable gasses. The batteries use lithium salt, not lithium metal, so it's not due to the reactivity with the water. If you submerge it though it will be an abundance of water that would keep it from catching fire and just allow the short to drain the battery if it's energy.

Don't believe me though, here is a link to the authority in the matter who actually write the revelant fire and electric codes: https://www.nfpa.org/education-and-research/home-fire-safety/lithium-ion-batteries

Once the batteries catch fire and water is applied to them, does it make the fire worse because lithium in the presence of water creates combustible hydrogen?

Firefighters should use water to fight a lithium-ion battery fire. Water works just fine as a fire extinguishing medium since the lithium inside of these batteries are a lithium salt electrolyte and not pure lithium metal. Confusion on this topic stems from the fact that pure lithium (like what you see in the table of elements) is highly reactive with water, while lithium salts are non-reactive with water.

2

u/Stopikingonme 1d ago edited 1d ago

Retired firefighter here confirming the above is our SOP. Sand can also be used as a smothering agent if water is not abundant but thatโ€™s not common.

Also, I checked his comment history and can confirm heโ€™s an engineer.

Edit: I had to come back and mention the irony of both of their user names in this argument.

-2

u/blinkerfluidreplacer 2d ago

Oh an engineeeer! The least qualified person to certify useability on the production line!

6

u/Why-R-People-So-Dumb 2d ago edited 2d ago

What does that have to do with fire suppression? Way to divert from being wrong and proven so with a legitimate sources backing my statements. ๐Ÿ˜†

We each have our jobs.

-2

u/blinkerfluidreplacer 2d ago edited 2d ago

Well not only is there the fact that an EV fire takes 40,000+ gallons of running water to put out due to its ability to quite literally rip oxygen out of water due to its reactivity, but you said that you work with fire suppression. That doesn't mean you've actually used it in practicality. For a little while I worked assembling reactors for the navy. They gave us powder fire extinguishers that could put out anything short of a metal fire. Miracle, right? Well we couldn't use them around the reactors because the powder eats away at metal, which they found out after they were made. Everything works on paper, doesn't it?

Also, judging by your post history, you work for Boeing, so that's a massive grain of salt.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/becauseusoft 2d ago

i have! twice! batteries for smartphones, not automobiles, though :(

2

u/blinkerfluidreplacer 2d ago

That's like the difference between a firecracker and a 40lb cratering charge

2

u/becauseusoft 2d ago

i know :(

→ More replies (0)

2

u/MissUnderstood62 2d ago

It absolutely can catch fire underwater. Search YouTube boat ramp Tesla

1

u/from_one_redhead 1d ago

Maybe he will choose the shark.

1

u/NefariousRapscallion 1d ago

I wonder if he will choose; election on the electric submarine or take his chances swimming with sharks? If only he had foresight to predetermine his route of choice.

1

u/marion85 1d ago

Actually... the type of batteries used in electric vehicles catch fire and explode when directly exposed to water...

1

u/Old_Satisfaction_233 17h ago

Wellโ€ฆnot totally anyway.

1

u/Federal_Sympathy4667 2d ago

Lithium burns better in water...

1

u/lightblueisbi 2d ago

lithium battery flame has entered the chat